5 Chrome Extensions for Accessibility Testing
You’re building a feature and want to know if it’s accessible before it ships. Running a full audit isn’t practical for every commit. What you need is a quick way to catch obvious issues during development—something that fits into your existing workflow without slowing you down.
Chrome accessibility extensions solve this problem. They run automated checks directly in your browser, giving you immediate feedback on WCAG 2.2 violations while you work. Here are five browser accessibility testing tools worth adding to your toolkit.
Key Takeaways
- Automated accessibility extensions catch 30-40% of issues, making them useful for quick checks but not a replacement for manual testing
- axe DevTools minimizes false positives, WAVE provides visual overlays, and Accessibility Insights bridges automated and manual testing
- Combine multiple tools for better coverage: use axe DevTools for routine checks, WAVE for visual verification, and Accessibility Insights for guided manual testing
- Passing automated checks doesn’t guarantee accessibility—keyboard testing, screen reader verification, and user feedback remain essential
What Automated Accessibility Testing Chrome Extensions Can (and Can’t) Do
Before diving into specific tools, set the right expectations. Automated accessibility testing Chrome extensions catch roughly 30-40% of accessibility issues. They’re excellent at detecting missing alt text, insufficient color contrast, improper heading hierarchy, and unlabeled form fields.
They can’t evaluate whether your alt text is meaningful, whether your tab order makes sense, or whether a screen reader user can actually complete a task. WCAG accessibility testing tools assist your workflow—they don’t replace manual testing or user feedback.
axe DevTools by Deque
axe DevTools integrates directly into Chrome DevTools as a dedicated panel. Click “Analyze,” and it scans the current page state, including dynamically rendered content.
What makes it useful: axe-core, the underlying engine, minimizes false positives. When it flags something, you can trust it’s a real issue. Each violation links to the specific element and explains the WCAG success criterion involved.
Best for: Developers who want reliable, actionable results during active development. The free tier covers most common checks, while paid versions add guided testing and issue tracking.
WAVE Evaluation Tool
WAVE takes a different approach. Instead of a separate panel, it overlays icons directly on your page—red for errors, yellow for alerts, and green for accessibility features present.
This visual feedback helps you understand issues in context. You see exactly where the missing label is, not just that one exists somewhere. WAVE also shows your heading structure and landmark regions, making it easy to verify document outline.
Best for: Quick visual audits and understanding how accessibility issues map to specific page elements. Particularly helpful when reviewing someone else’s code.
Accessibility Insights for Web
Accessibility Insights from Microsoft offers two modes: FastPass for quick automated checks and Assessment for comprehensive manual testing with guided instructions.
FastPass runs about 50 automated checks and includes a tab stops visualizer—essential for verifying keyboard navigation. The Assessment mode walks you through manual tests that automation can’t handle, making it a bridge between automated and human testing.
Best for: Teams building a structured accessibility testing process. The guided assessments help developers learn what to check manually.
Discover how at OpenReplay.com.
Siteimprove Accessibility Checker
Siteimprove’s extension provides detailed explanations alongside each issue it finds. Beyond flagging problems, it explains why they matter and suggests fixes.
The extension includes simulation tools for color blindness, helping you experience your design from different perspectives. Results can be filtered by conformance level, making it easier to prioritize when you’re targeting WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
Best for: Developers newer to accessibility who benefit from educational context alongside technical findings.
IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker
IBM Equal Access is open source and integrates into DevTools. It uses IBM’s accessibility rule engine and provides detailed reports with specific code references.
One strength: it handles dynamic content well, making it suitable for testing JavaScript-heavy applications where the DOM changes frequently.
Best for: Developers working on complex web applications who need a free, open-source option with solid documentation.
Combining Tools for Better Coverage
No single extension catches everything. A practical approach: use axe DevTools for routine development checks, WAVE for visual verification, and Accessibility Insights when you need guided manual testing.
Run automated scans early and often. When you find issues, fix them before they compound. But remember—passing automated checks doesn’t mean your site is accessible. Keyboard testing, screen reader verification, and real user feedback remain essential.
Conclusion
These browser accessibility testing tools give you fast feedback loops during development. That’s their value. Use them as a first line of defense, not a final verdict. By integrating these extensions into your workflow, you catch common issues early while recognizing that true accessibility requires human judgment and testing with real users.
FAQs
Start with axe DevTools for its low false-positive rate and reliable results. It integrates into Chrome DevTools and provides actionable feedback without overwhelming you with noise. Once comfortable, add WAVE for visual context and Accessibility Insights for guided manual testing.
No. Automated tools catch only 30-40% of accessibility issues. They detect technical violations like missing alt text and color contrast problems but cannot evaluate content quality, logical tab order, or whether users can complete tasks. Manual testing and real user feedback are essential for full compliance.
Run automated scans with each significant UI change or before committing code. Catching issues early prevents them from compounding. Treat accessibility checks like linting—frequent, lightweight scans during development with more thorough manual testing before major releases.
Most offer free tiers sufficient for basic testing. axe DevTools, WAVE, Accessibility Insights, and IBM Equal Access provide robust free versions. Siteimprove offers a free extension with limited features. Paid versions typically add team collaboration, detailed reporting, and guided testing workflows.
Gain control over your UX
See how users are using your site as if you were sitting next to them, learn and iterate faster with OpenReplay. — the open-source session replay tool for developers. Self-host it in minutes, and have complete control over your customer data. Check our GitHub repo and join the thousands of developers in our community.
