Back

Controlling Line Length in CSS for Better Readability

Controlling Line Length in CSS for Better Readability

Text that stretches across your entire screen is exhausting to read. Your eyes lose their place, comprehension drops, and readers abandon your content. Yet controlling line length in CSS remains one of the most overlooked aspects of web typography.

This article covers the research behind optimal line length, practical CSS techniques for implementation, and why the “rules” aren’t as rigid as you might think.

Key Takeaways

  • Optimal line length for body text ranges from 50-75 characters per line
  • The ch unit provides font-relative measurements that scale automatically
  • Modern CSS functions like clamp() and container queries enable responsive line length control
  • Accessibility considerations may require shorter line lengths for certain users

Why Line Length Matters for Reading Experience

When text runs too wide, readers face several problems:

  • Return sweeps become difficult: Your eyes struggle to find the next line’s beginning
  • Comprehension decreases: Wide text feels overwhelming and intimidating
  • Reading motivation drops: Each new line provides a psychological boost—longer lines mean fewer boosts

Research from the Baymard Institute shows that 50-75 characters per line creates the optimal reading experience for body text. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) sets an upper limit of 80 characters (40 for Chinese, Japanese, or Korean text).

But here’s what’s interesting: Mary Dyson’s research challenges the long-held belief that shorter lines are always better. Her findings show that readers can process words even when their eyes “undershoot” the beginning of a new line. This means longer lines don’t necessarily slow reading speed as much as we thought.

Modern CSS Techniques for Line Length Control

Using Character Units (ch)

The simplest approach uses CSS character units:

.content {
  max-width: 65ch;
}

One ch equals the width of the “0” character in your chosen font. This creates a relative measurement that scales with font size.

Responsive Line Length with clamp() and min()

For responsive designs, combine clamp() with viewport units:

.article {
  max-width: clamp(45ch, 90vw, 75ch);
}

This code:

  • Sets a minimum width of 45ch
  • Prefers 90% viewport width on smaller screens
  • Caps at 75ch maximum on larger displays

For more complex scenarios, you can nest min() within clamp():

.article {
  max-width: clamp(45ch, min(90vw, 65ch), 75ch);
}

This ensures text remains readable on small screens while maintaining optimal line length on larger displays.

Container Queries for Context-Aware Sizing

.text-container {
  container-type: inline-size;
}

.text-content {
  max-width: min(100cqi, 65ch);
}

Container queries let you set line length based on the container’s size rather than the viewport, perfect for component-based designs.

Natural Line Length Through Layout Design

Sometimes CSS isn’t necessary. Strategic layout choices naturally constrain text width:

  • Multi-column layouts: Split content into columns
  • Sidebar designs: Place navigation or supplementary content alongside main text
  • Card-based layouts: Contain text within defined boundaries
  • Grid systems: Use CSS Grid to create natural content boundaries

These approaches often feel more organic than hard-coded width limits.

Accessibility and Special Considerations

Readers with Dyslexia

People with dyslexia often benefit from shorter line lengths—around 45-50 characters. Consider offering a “reading mode” toggle that applies tighter constraints:

.reading-mode {
  max-width: 50ch;
  line-height: 1.8;
}

Multi-Language Support

Different languages require different considerations:

  • Asian languages: WCAG recommends 40 characters maximum
  • Right-to-left languages: Ensure your line length CSS works with dir="rtl"
  • German and compound words: May need slightly wider limits

Finding Your Optimal Range

Rather than following rigid rules, consider these factors:

  1. Font choice: Wider fonts may need fewer characters per line
  2. Font size: Larger text can handle slightly longer lines
  3. Content type: Technical documentation might work with longer lines than marketing copy
  4. Device context: Mobile readers tolerate shorter lines better

Test your line length CSS across devices and gather user feedback. What works for a blog might not suit an e-commerce product description.

Conclusion

Controlling line length in CSS improves readability, but optimal implementation depends on your specific context. Start with the 50-75 character guideline, use modern CSS functions for responsive behavior, and remember that accessibility needs may require tighter constraints. Most importantly, test with real users—the best line length is the one that helps your readers actually read.

FAQs

The ch unit scales with font size automatically, making it more flexible than pixels. One ch equals the width of the zero character in your current font, so if users zoom or change font size, the line length adjusts proportionally while pixel values remain fixed.

Use CSS clamp() or min() functions to create responsive limits. For example, max-width: min(90vw, 65ch) ensures the text never exceeds 90% of the viewport width on small screens while maintaining the 65ch limit on larger displays.

Yes, headings can typically handle longer line lengths since they're shorter overall and use larger fonts. Body text should stay within 50-75 characters, while headings can extend to 80-100 characters without harming readability.

Truly understand users experience

See every user interaction, feel every frustration and track all hesitations with OpenReplay — the open-source digital experience platform. It can be self-hosted in minutes, giving you complete control over your customer data. . Check our GitHub repo and join the thousands of developers in our community..

OpenReplay