CSS Grid Lanes: The New Native Masonry Layout

You’ve built Pinterest-style layouts before. You’ve used JavaScript libraries, CSS multi-column hacks, or complex Grid workarounds with calculated row spans. Each approach works, but none feels native.

CSS Grid Level 3 is exploring native masonry-style behavior within Grid. One current proposal introduces display: grid-lanes as a possible syntax for this feature—but before you refactor your production code, you need to understand where things actually stand in early 2026.

This article covers the core concept behind CSS Grid Lanes, how it differs from traditional Grid, current browser support realities, and what you should consider before adopting it.

What CSS Grid Lanes Actually Does

Traditional CSS Grid operates on two axes simultaneously. You define both rows and columns, and items occupy explicit cells. This creates predictable, rectangular layouts—but it also leaves gaps when items have varying heights.

The CSS Grid Level 3 draft introduces masonry-style behavior, sometimes referred to as “grid lanes,” where you define tracks on one axis (typically columns) and items pack tightly on the other axis using a masonry-style algorithm. Items flow into whichever lane has the most available space, filling gaps automatically.

The current draft syntax under discussion looks like this:

.container {
  display: grid-lanes;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, minmax(250px, 1fr));
  gap: 16px;
}

However, syntax and behavior are still evolving. Earlier experiments used values like masonry within grid-template-rows or grid-template-columns, and some engines implemented prototype versions of those approaches. The CSS Working Group continues refining how masonry integrates into Grid Level 3. See the latest draft of the CSS Grid Layout Module Level 3.

How Grid Lanes Differs from Standard Grid

With display: grid, items respect both row and column tracks. Shorter items leave empty space below them until the next row begins.

With masonry-style Grid behavior, only one axis has defined tracks. Items on the other axis stack based on available space, not strict row boundaries. This creates the characteristic staggered appearance of masonry layouts.

Most familiar Grid features—such as defining column tracks and explicit placement—remain conceptually available, but implementations may vary while the feature is experimental. Behavior such as spanning and edge-case placement is not yet fully interoperable across engines.

Waterfall vs. Brick Layouts

Define columns with grid-template-columns, and items flow vertically—the classic waterfall layout. Define rows with grid-template-rows (in experimental implementations), and items flow horizontally in a brick-style pattern.

Details such as flow behavior and ordering controls are still under discussion in the spec and may differ between browser previews. Avoid relying on non-standard or draft-only properties unless you verify support in your target browser.

Browser Support: The Realistic Picture

Here’s where production planning gets complicated.

As of early 2026, native masonry behavior in CSS Grid remains experimental across all major browsers:

• Safari Technology Preview has one of the more complete prototype implementations.
• Chromium-based browsers have experimented with masonry-related syntax behind flags, including earlier masonry track values.
• Firefox has implemented masonry experiments behind configuration flags.

No major stable browser channel offers fully interoperable, unflagged support at the time of writing. You can track compatibility status via Can I use and browser release notes.

The CSS Working Group continues refining integration details within Grid Level 3.

The practical takeaway: Do not ship masonry-style Grid syntax to production without fallbacks.

Progressive Enhancement Strategy

Feature detection lets you experiment where supported while falling back gracefully:

.container {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, minmax(250px, 1fr));
  gap: 16px;
}

@supports (display: grid-lanes) {
  .container {
    display: grid-lanes;
  }
}

Browsers without support render a standard Grid layout. Items align to rows instead of packing tightly—an acceptable baseline for many use cases.

Because syntax may change before stabilization, treat this as progressive enhancement rather than a long-term production dependency.

Accessibility and Source Order Concerns

Masonry layouts introduce a DOM-versus-visual-order problem. Items appear in positions determined by the packing algorithm, not their source order. A user tabbing through content may jump unpredictably across the layout.

This is not unique to Grid Lanes—it is inherent to masonry-style layouts. You should test keyboard navigation thoroughly, especially for content where reading sequence matters.

Screen readers follow DOM order regardless of visual placement. Ensure your HTML structure makes sense when read linearly.

Conclusion

For experiments, prototypes, and progressive enhancement layers, masonry-style Grid behavior is worth exploring now. The direction is becoming clearer within Grid Level 3, and hands-on experience today pays off when browser support matures.

For production features requiring consistent cross-browser behavior, hold off. Monitor spec discussions and browser implementation notes before committing.

Native CSS masonry has been a long-standing request. It is finally taking shape—but it is not fully standardized or interoperable yet. Verify browser support matches your requirements before adopting it widely.

FAQs

Truly understand users experience

See every user interaction, feel every frustration and track all hesitations with OpenReplay — the open-source digital experience platform. It can be self-hosted in minutes, giving you complete control over your customer data. . Check our GitHub repo and join the thousands of developers in our community..