Back

When to use MCP vs REST vs GraphQL in your project

When to use MCP vs REST vs GraphQL in your project

Choosing between REST, GraphQL, and MCP isn’t just about what’s “new” or “popular.” It’s about what matches your project’s needs. As a junior developer, knowing the right tool for the right situation can save you time and frustration. This guide explains when to use each option — practically, simply, and with real examples.

Key Takeaways

  • REST, GraphQL, and MCP serve different technical needs: simple APIs, flexible data queries, and AI-powered tool integrations.
  • Understanding the type of app you’re building is the first step to choosing the right one.

1. When to use REST

Use REST if:

  • Your app deals with simple resources that map cleanly to URLs.
  • You want strong caching, simple debugging, and mature community support.
  • You don’t need highly dynamic queries from the client side.

Example: A simple blog backend

In a blog platform:

GET /posts       # Get all blog posts
GET /posts/1     # Get the blog post with ID 1
POST /posts      # Create a new blog post
PUT /posts/1     # Update post 1
DELETE /posts/1  # Delete post 1

You can easily model Posts, Users, Comments, etc., using basic HTTP verbs (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE).

Why REST fits here:

  • The structure is predictable.
  • HTTP methods map directly to operations.
  • It’s easy to work with browser tools and libraries like fetch, axios, etc.

Best for CRUD apps, backends for mobile apps, microservices.

2. When to use GraphQL

Use GraphQL if:

  • You often need to fetch related or nested data in a flexible way.
  • You want clients (the browser or app) to ask only for the fields they need.
  • You aim to minimize the number of network requests.

Example: A product catalog for an e-commerce app

Instead of doing several REST calls for product info and reviews, you can query like this:

query {
  product(id: "123") {
    name
    price
    images {
      url
      altText
    }
    reviews {
      author
      rating
      comment
    }
  }
}

One request — and you get everything you need.

Why GraphQL fits here:

  • You avoid over-fetching (getting too much data) and under-fetching (missing data).
  • You optimize for mobile devices with slower networks.
  • It fits applications where front-end developers move fast and want control over data.

Best for SPAs (Single Page Apps), mobile apps, dashboards.

3. When to use MCP

Use MCP if:

  • You are building AI-first products that need an LLM (like Claude, GPT) to interact with live systems.
  • You want dynamic two-way communication: models discovering and using tools at runtime.
  • You need your app to be AI-native, not just AI-assisted.

Example: AI agent writing to a database

Rather than coding each interaction manually, the LLM can discover and use available operations:

# Example of calling an MCP-discovered tool

# Connect to the MCP client
mcp_client = MCPClient()

# Discover available tools
available_tools = mcp_client.list_tools()

# Find the tool for database insert
db_insert_tool = available_tools["insert_user"]

# Execute it
response = db_insert_tool.execute({
    "username": "new_user",
    "email": "user@example.com"
})

print(response)

The model didn’t need to “know” about the database beforehand. The MCP server described the tool, and the LLM used it.

Why MCP fits here:

  • You can add, remove, and upgrade tools without re-training or re-prompting the model.
  • LLMs work with APIs, databases, and storage in a universal way.
  • It reduces the custom glue code you usually need when building agent-based apps.

Best for AI applications, AI agents, tool-using LLMs.

Quick comparison table

CriteriaRESTGraphQLMCP
API design styleFixed endpointsFlexible queriesDynamic tool and resource discovery
Who controls data shape?ServerClientLLM, dynamically
Real-time supportNoLimited (subscriptions)Yes, event-driven interaction
State managementStatelessStatelessStateful sessions possible
Best use caseSimple web or mobile APIsComplex front-end driven appsAI-native applications needing external context
Developer maturityVery matureGrowing rapidlyEmerging, still evolving

Bonus: 5 Quick Questions to Pick Between REST, GraphQL, and MCP

QuestionIf Yes →
Is your app about CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations?Use REST
Does the front-end need to control exactly what data it gets?Use GraphQL
Are you building something where an AI (LLM) acts, decides, or uses tools?Use MCP
Do you need real-time two-way interaction between tools and the app?Use MCP
Is stability and broad community support critical?Use REST

Conclusion

Choosing between REST, GraphQL, and MCP isn’t about hype — it’s about understanding your app’s needs:

  • Pick REST if you need simplicity and broad tool support.
  • Pick GraphQL if you want flexible queries and control over payload size.
  • Pick MCP if you’re building apps where AI is the main actor, not just a helper.

Each approach fits a different future: REST for traditional apps, GraphQL for dynamic front-ends, and MCP for AI-powered systems.

FAQs

Yes. Some MCP servers can expose GraphQL APIs as tools, letting LLMs query them at runtime.

MCP is relatively new (released in late 2024), but it's growing fast. For AI-first projects, it's worth experimenting now.

Yes, they are different models. MCP isn't just a new API — it's a whole new way for AIs to interact dynamically. It often requires rethinking how you expose functionality.

Listen to your bugs 🧘, with OpenReplay

See how users use your app and resolve issues fast.
Loved by thousands of developers