SolidJS vs React: Comparing Component Models and Performance

When choosing a frontend framework, understanding how it handles component rendering and performance is crucial. For React developers considering SolidJS, the differences in component models and reactivity systems directly impact application performance and development experience.
This article compares SolidJS and React’s component models, focusing on their rendering mechanisms, performance characteristics, and practical code differences.
Key Takeaways
- React uses a render-based model where components re-execute on every state change, while SolidJS components run once and create reactive bindings
- React employs coarse-grained reactivity with a Virtual DOM, while SolidJS uses fine-grained reactivity with direct DOM updates
- SolidJS generally outperforms React, especially for applications with frequent updates or large datasets
- React requires explicit memoization techniques, while SolidJS needs fewer optimizations due to its reactive system
- SolidJS has a significantly smaller core library size (~7KB) compared to React (~40KB)
Component Models: Fundamental Differences
React and SolidJS take fundamentally different approaches to component rendering, despite their similar JSX syntax.
React’s Component Model
React uses a render-based model with these key characteristics:
- Components are functions that run on every state change
- Uses a Virtual DOM to minimize actual DOM updates
- Relies on diffing to determine what changed
- Components re-render their entire subtree by default
function Counter() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
// This function runs on every render
console.log("Component rendering");
return (
<div>
<p>Count: {count}</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>Increment</button>
</div>
);
}
In this example, the entire component function re-executes whenever count
changes, and React’s reconciliation process determines what DOM updates are needed.
SolidJS’s Component Model
SolidJS uses a reactive compilation model with these characteristics:
- Components run only once during initialization
- No Virtual DOM or diffing algorithm
- Creates a reactive graph of dependencies
- Updates only the specific DOM nodes affected by state changes
function Counter() {
const [count, setCount] = createSignal(0);
// This function runs only once
console.log("Component initializing");
return (
<div>
<p>Count: {count()}</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count() + 1)}>Increment</button>
</div>
);
}
In SolidJS, the component function executes just once. The reactive system tracks which parts of the DOM depend on which signals, updating only those specific nodes when values change.
Reactivity Systems Compared
The reactivity systems of React and SolidJS determine how state changes propagate to the UI.
React’s Hook-Based Reactivity
React uses a coarse-grained reactivity system:
- State is managed through hooks like
useState
anduseReducer
- State changes trigger re-rendering of components
- React relies on memoization (
useMemo
,useCallback
,React.memo
) to prevent unnecessary re-renders - Data flow is managed through props and context
function TodoList() {
const [todos, setTodos] = useState([
{ id: 1, text: "Learn React", completed: false },
{ id: 2, text: "Build app", completed: false }
]);
// This entire component re-renders when todos change
const toggleTodo = (id) => {
setTodos(todos.map(todo =>
todo.id === id ? {...todo, completed: !todo.completed} : todo
));
};
return (
<ul>
{todos.map(todo => (
<TodoItem
key={todo.id}
todo={todo}
onToggle={() => toggleTodo(todo.id)}
/>
))}
</ul>
);
}
// This component re-renders when props change
function TodoItem({ todo, onToggle }) {
console.log(`Rendering: ${todo.text}`);
return (
<li>
<input
type="checkbox"
checked={todo.completed}
onChange={onToggle}
/>
<span>{todo.text}</span>
</li>
);
}
SolidJS’s Fine-Grained Reactivity
SolidJS uses a fine-grained reactivity system:
- State is managed through reactive primitives like
createSignal
andcreateStore
- Updates are granular, targeting only affected DOM nodes
- No need for extensive memoization
- Reactive dependencies are tracked automatically
function TodoList() {
const [todos, setTodos] = createStore([
{ id: 1, text: "Learn SolidJS", completed: false },
{ id: 2, text: "Build app", completed: false }
]);
const toggleTodo = (id) => {
setTodos(id, "completed", completed => !completed);
};
return (
<ul>
<For each={todos}>
{(todo) => (
<TodoItem todo={todo} onToggle={[toggleTodo, todo.id]} />
)}
</For>
</ul>
);
}
function TodoItem(props) {
// This logs only once during initialization
console.log(`Creating: ${props.todo.text}`);
return (
<li>
<input
type="checkbox"
checked={props.todo.completed}
onChange={() => props.onToggle[0](props.onToggle[1])}
/>
<span>{props.todo.text}</span>
</li>
);
}
Performance Benchmarks and Analysis
The different component models lead to significant performance differences between React and SolidJS.
Rendering Performance
According to the JS Framework Benchmark, SolidJS consistently outperforms React across most metrics:
- Initial rendering: SolidJS is typically 30-40% faster
- Update performance: SolidJS can be 2-5x faster for partial updates
- Memory usage: SolidJS uses significantly less memory due to its compiled approach
DOM Operations
The key performance difference stems from how DOM operations are handled:
- React: Creates a virtual representation of the DOM, diffs it against the previous version, then applies changes
- SolidJS: Compiles components into direct DOM operations with no intermediate representation
This difference becomes more pronounced with:
- Large lists of items
- Frequent state updates
- Complex component trees
Real-World Component Examples
Let’s examine how these differences play out in a practical example: a filterable list.
React Implementation
function FilterableList() {
const [items] = useState([
"Apple", "Banana", "Cherry", "Date", "Elderberry"
]);
const [filter, setFilter] = useState("");
// This calculation runs on every render
const filteredItems = items.filter(item =>
item.toLowerCase().includes(filter.toLowerCase())
);
return (
<div>
<input
type="text"
value={filter}
onChange={e => setFilter(e.target.value)}
placeholder="Filter items..."
/>
<ul>
{filteredItems.map(item => (
<li key={item}>{item}</li>
))}
</ul>
</div>
);
}
In React, when the filter changes:
- The entire component re-renders
- The filtering logic re-executes
- React diffs the previous and new list
- Only changed DOM nodes are updated
SolidJS Implementation
function FilterableList() {
const [items] = createSignal([
"Apple", "Banana", "Cherry", "Date", "Elderberry"
]);
const [filter, setFilter] = createSignal("");
// This creates a derived signal that recalculates only when dependencies change
const filteredItems = createMemo(() =>
items().filter(item =>
item.toLowerCase().includes(filter().toLowerCase())
)
);
return (
<div>
<input
type="text"
value={filter()}
onInput={e => setFilter(e.target.value)}
placeholder="Filter items..."
/>
<ul>
<For each={filteredItems()}>
{item => <li>{item}</li>}
</For>
</ul>
</div>
);
}
In SolidJS, when the filter changes:
- Only the
filter
signal updates - The
filteredItems
memo recalculates - The
For
component efficiently updates only the list items that need to change - No component re-rendering occurs
Memory Usage and Bundle Size
The component models also affect memory usage and bundle size:
Memory Footprint
- React: Higher memory usage due to component instances, fiber nodes, and the virtual DOM
- SolidJS: Lower memory usage as components are compiled away after initialization
Bundle Size
- React: Core library is ~40KB (minified + gzipped)
- SolidJS: Core library is ~7KB (minified + gzipped)
This difference can be significant for performance-critical applications, especially on mobile devices.
Optimization Techniques
Each framework requires different optimization approaches due to their component models.
React Optimization
React developers need to be familiar with several optimization techniques:
React.memo
to prevent unnecessary component re-rendersuseMemo
to cache expensive calculationsuseCallback
to stabilize function references- Careful state management to avoid re-rendering large component trees
// Optimized React component
const ExpensiveComponent = React.memo(({ data, onAction }) => {
// Component logic
});
function ParentComponent() {
const [data, setData] = useState([]);
// Stabilize function reference
const handleAction = useCallback((id) => {
// Action logic
}, []);
// Cache expensive calculation
const processedData = useMemo(() => {
return data.map(item => expensiveProcess(item));
}, [data]);
return <ExpensiveComponent data={processedData} onAction={handleAction} />;
}
SolidJS Optimization
SolidJS requires fewer explicit optimizations:
createMemo
for caching expensive calculations- Proper signal usage to ensure granular updates
// SolidJS component with minimal optimization needed
function ParentComponent() {
const [data, setData] = createSignal([]);
// Function doesn't need stabilization
const handleAction = (id) => {
// Action logic
};
// Cache expensive calculation
const processedData = createMemo(() => {
return data().map(item => expensiveProcess(item));
});
return <ExpensiveComponent data={processedData()} onAction={handleAction} />;
}
Conclusion
The fundamental difference between React and SolidJS lies in their component models. React’s render-based approach provides a simpler mental model but requires more optimization for performance-critical applications. SolidJS’s reactive compilation model delivers superior performance with less optimization effort but requires understanding reactive programming concepts.
Your choice between these frameworks should consider your application’s performance requirements, team expertise, and ecosystem needs. React offers maturity and a vast ecosystem, while SolidJS provides performance advantages and a more efficient reactivity model.
Both frameworks have their strengths, and understanding their component models helps you make an informed decision for your next project.
FAQs
While SolidJS typically outperforms React in benchmarks, real-world performance depends on your application's specific needs. React may perform adequately for many applications, especially with proper optimization.
The transition requires learning SolidJS's reactivity model, but the similar JSX syntax makes migration easier than to other frameworks. However, you'll need to rewrite components to use SolidJS's reactive primitives instead of React hooks.
SolidJS covers most of React's core functionality but has a smaller ecosystem. It provides alternatives for key React features like context, fragments, portals, and suspense.
Choose React if you need a mature ecosystem, extensive community support, or are building a large application with an established team. Choose SolidJS if performance is critical, you're building a performance-sensitive application, or you prefer a more efficient reactivity model.
SolidJS achieves better performance through: 1) Compilation-based approach that transforms components into efficient DOM operations, 2) Fine-grained reactivity that updates only what changed, 3) No Virtual DOM overhead, 4) Minimal runtime with smaller memory footprint.