5 Tips and Tricks for AI-Assisted Coding

The promise of AI-assisted coding is simple: write better code faster. The reality? Most developers using tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, or Claude find themselves debugging AI-generated bugs, refactoring inconsistent code, or worse—introducing security vulnerabilities they didn’t anticipate. The difference between productive AI-assisted development and a mess of technical debt comes down to technique.

From real-world use and developer experience, clear patterns have emerged. This article distills those into five practical strategies to improve code quality, reduce debugging time, and maintain the human oversight essential for production systems.

1. Write Prompts Like API Contracts

Why Specificity Matters in AI Code Generation

AI models operate within context windows—typically 4,000 to 100,000 tokens depending on the model. When prompts lack specificity, models fill gaps with assumptions based on training data, often producing plausible-looking code that fails edge cases or violates project conventions.

Consider this vague prompt: “Create a user validation function.” An AI might generate basic email validation, but miss your requirements for password complexity, username uniqueness, or rate limiting. The debugging time spent fixing these assumptions often exceeds writing the code manually.

Effective Prompt Structure

Treat prompts like API contracts. Include:

• Input types and constraints: “Accept a UserInput object with email (string, max 255 chars), password (string, 8-128 chars)”
• Expected outputs: “Return ValidationResult with isValid boolean and errors array”
• Edge cases: “Handle null inputs, empty strings, and SQL injection attempts”
• Performance requirements: “Complete validation in under 50ms for 95th percentile”

Example transformation:

// Vague prompt:
"Write a function to validate user registration"

// Specific prompt:
"Write a TypeScript function validateUserRegistration that:
- Accepts: {email: string, password: string, username: string}
- Returns: {isValid: boolean, errors: Record<string, string>}
- Validates: email format (RFC 5322), password (min 8 chars, 1 uppercase, 1 number), 
  username (alphanumeric, 3-20 chars)
- Handles: null/undefined inputs gracefully
- Performance: Pure function, no external calls"

This specificity reduces iteration cycles and produces more reliable initial output.

2. Break Complex Tasks Into Atomic Operations

The Context Window Problem

AI models perform best with focused, single-purpose requests. Complex prompts that span multiple architectural layers or combine unrelated features lead to:

• Confused implementations mixing concerns
• Incomplete error handling
• Inconsistent coding patterns

Longer prompts or those that mix multiple distinct operations often reduce accuracy and lead to inconsistent results.

Practical Task Decomposition

Instead of requesting “Build a complete user authentication system,” decompose into:

1. Data validation layer: Input sanitization and validation rules
2. Business logic: Password hashing, token generation
3. Database operations: User creation, duplicate checking
4. API endpoints: Request handling and response formatting

Each component gets its own focused prompt with clear interfaces to other layers. This approach produces:

• More maintainable, modular code
• Easier testing and debugging
• Consistent patterns across the codebase

Example workflow for a REST endpoint:

Prompt 1: "Create input validation for POST /users with email and password"
Prompt 2: "Write password hashing using bcrypt with salt rounds 10"
Prompt 3: "Create PostgreSQL query to insert user, handling unique constraint"
Prompt 4: "Combine into Express endpoint with proper error responses"

3. Implement Test-Driven AI Development

Tests as Guardrails for AI-Generated Code

The most effective way to ensure AI-generated code meets requirements is defining those requirements as executable tests. This approach transforms vague acceptance criteria into concrete specifications the AI cannot misinterpret.

The TDD-AI Workflow

Step 1: Write comprehensive tests first

describe('parseCSV', () => {
  it('handles standard CSV format', () => {
    expect(parseCSV('a,b,c\n1,2,3')).toEqual([['a','b','c'],['1','2','3']]);
  });
  
  it('handles quoted values with commas', () => {
    expect(parseCSV('"hello, world",test')).toEqual([['hello, world','test']]);
  });
  
  it('handles empty values', () => {
    expect(parseCSV('a,,c')).toEqual([['a','','c']]);
  });
});

Step 2: Generate implementation Provide tests to the AI with the prompt: “Implement parseCSV function to pass all provided tests. Use no external libraries.”

Step 3: Iterate until green Run tests, feed failures back to the AI for fixes. This creates a feedback loop that converges on correct implementation faster than manual debugging.

This workflow particularly excels for:

• Data transformation functions
• Algorithm implementations
• API response handlers
• Validation logic

4. Establish Code Review Protocols for AI Output

Critical Review Areas

AI-generated code requires different review focus than human-written code. Priority areas include:

Security vulnerabilities: AI models trained on public repositories often reproduce common vulnerabilities:

• SQL injection in string concatenation
• Missing authentication checks
• Hardcoded secrets or weak cryptography

Performance pitfalls:

• N+1 database queries in loops
• Unbounded memory allocation
• Synchronous operations blocking event loops

Architectural consistency: AI lacks project context, potentially violating:

• Established patterns (dependency injection, error handling)
• Naming conventions
• Module boundaries

Automated and Manual Review Balance

Layer your review process:

1. Automated scanning: Run AI output through:

   • ESLint/Prettier for style consistency
   • Semgrep or CodeQL for security patterns
   • Bundle size analysis for frontend code

2. Focused human review: Concentrate on:

   • Business logic correctness
   • Edge case handling
   • Integration with existing systems
   • Long-term maintainability

Create AI-specific review checklists that your team updates based on common issues found in your codebase.

5. Maintain Human Control Over Architecture

Where AI Falls Short

Current AI models excel at implementation but struggle with:

• System design: Choosing between microservices vs monolith
• Technology selection: Evaluating tradeoffs between frameworks
• Scalability planning: Anticipating growth patterns
• Domain modeling: Understanding business requirements deeply

These decisions require understanding context AI models cannot access: team expertise, infrastructure constraints, business roadmaps.

The Developer-AI Partnership Model

Effective AI-assisted development follows this division:

Developers own:

• Architecture decisions
• Interface definitions
• Technology choices
• Business logic design

AI implements:

• Boilerplate code
• Algorithm implementations
• Data transformations
• Test scaffolding

This partnership model ensures AI amplifies developer productivity without compromising system design quality. Use AI to rapidly prototype within architectural constraints you define, not to make architectural decisions.

Conclusion

AI-assisted coding tools are powerful accelerators when used strategically. The key insight: treat them as highly capable but limited partners that excel at implementation within clear constraints. Start by implementing one technique—whether structured prompts or test-driven development—and measure the impact on your code quality and velocity. As you build confidence, layer in additional practices.

The developers who thrive with AI assistance aren’t those who delegate thinking to the machine, but those who use it to implement their ideas faster and more reliably than ever before.

FAQs

Understand every bug

Uncover frustrations, understand bugs and fix slowdowns like never before with OpenReplay — the open-source session replay tool for developers. Self-host it in minutes, and have complete control over your customer data. Check our GitHub repo and join the thousands of developers in our community.