Using the CSS if() Function for Conditional Styling

CSS conditional styling has traditionally relied on media queries, container queries, and custom property workarounds. The new CSS if() function changes this by bringing inline conditional logic directly to property values. As of August 2025, this feature is available in Chrome 137+, Edge 137+, Chrome for Android, and Android Browser, offering developers a cleaner approach to dynamic styling.
This article explores the if() function’s syntax, its three query types, and practical applications that demonstrate why it’s becoming an essential tool for modern CSS development.
Key Takeaways
- The CSS if() function enables inline conditional logic within property values using semicolon-separated syntax
- Three query types are supported: style() for custom properties, media() for responsive conditions, and supports() for feature detection
- Browser support is currently limited to Chrome/Edge 137+ and Android browsers, requiring fallback strategies for production use
- The function reduces code duplication and keeps conditional logic co-located with the properties it affects
Understanding the CSS if() Function Syntax
The CSS if() function follows a specific pattern that sets it apart from other CSS functions:
property: if(condition: value; else: fallback);
Notice the semicolon separating condition-value pairs—not commas like other CSS functions. You can also chain multiple conditions:
property: if(
condition-1: value-1;
condition-2: value-2;
condition-3: value-3;
else: fallback
);
The function requires no space between if
and the opening parenthesis. This strict syntax helps the CSS parser distinguish between multiple conditions within a single function call.
Three Types of Conditional Queries
style() Queries
The style() query checks custom property values on the current element:
.button {
background: if(
style(--variant: primary): #0066cc;
else: transparent
);
}
Unlike container style queries, style() within if() applies directly to the styled element—no parent container needed.
media() Queries
Media queries work inline, eliminating the need for separate rule blocks:
.nav-item {
padding: if(
media(min-width: 768px): 16px 24px;
else: 8px 12px
);
}
supports() Queries
Test for CSS feature support directly within property values:
.container {
display: if(
supports(display: grid): grid;
else: flex
);
}
Real-World Example: Adaptive Button Sizing
Let’s create a button that adapts its size based on the user’s input method—a common accessibility requirement:
button {
/* Touch-friendly sizing for coarse pointers */
width: if(media(any-pointer: coarse): 44px; else: 30px);
height: if(media(any-pointer: coarse): 44px; else: 30px);
/* Adjust padding accordingly */
padding: if(
media(any-pointer: coarse): 12px 16px;
else: 8px 12px
);
/* Maintain consistent styling */
border-radius: 6px;
transition: all 0.2s ease;
}
This approach keeps all responsive logic inline with each property, making the component’s behavior immediately clear without jumping between rule blocks.
Theme Switching with Conditional Styling
Design systems often require multiple themes. The if() function excels at this pattern:
:root {
--theme: ocean; /* or forest or sunset */
}
.card {
background: if(
style(--theme: ocean): #e3f2fd;
style(--theme: forest): #e8f5e9;
style(--theme: sunset): #fff3e0;
else: #ffffff
);
color: if(
style(--theme: ocean): #0d47a1;
style(--theme: forest): #1b5e20;
style(--theme: sunset): #e65100;
else: #333333
);
border: 2px solid if(
style(--theme: ocean): #1976d2;
style(--theme: forest): #388e3c;
style(--theme: sunset): #f57c00;
else: #cccccc
);
}
To switch themes, simply update the custom property:
.ocean-theme { --theme: ocean; }
.forest-theme { --theme: forest; }
.sunset-theme { --theme: sunset; }
Comparing if() to Traditional Approaches
The if() function offers advantages over existing conditional CSS patterns:
vs. Media Queries:
- Keeps logic inline rather than scattered across rule blocks
- Reduces code duplication
- Makes component behavior more transparent
vs. Custom Property Toggles:
- More readable and explicit
- No need for complex calc() workarounds
- Self-documenting code
vs. Container Style Queries:
- Applies directly to elements without parent dependencies
- Simpler syntax for single-property conditions
- Better for component-level styling
Browser Support and Implementation
Currently, the CSS if() function is supported in:
- Chrome 137+
- Edge 137+
- Chrome for Android
- Android Browser
For unsupported browsers, continue using traditional approaches as fallbacks. The limited support means production use requires careful consideration of your user base.
For detailed specifications and updates, refer to the MDN Web Docs for the CSS if() Function.
Conclusion
The CSS if() function represents a significant step forward in conditional styling. By bringing logic inline with property declarations, it creates more maintainable and understandable stylesheets. While browser support remains limited, the function’s potential for cleaner theming, responsive design, and state-based styling makes it worth exploring for future projects.
As browser adoption grows, expect the if() function to become a standard tool for handling conditional CSS, replacing many current workarounds with cleaner, more intuitive syntax.
FAQs
The if() function applies conditions inline within property values, while media queries require separate rule blocks. This keeps related logic together and reduces code duplication.
Currently, the style() query only works with CSS custom properties (variables). You cannot check regular properties like background-color or width directly.
Use progressive enhancement. Write your base styles using traditional methods, then layer if() functions for supported browsers. Feature detection with @supports can help manage this transition.
Semicolons help the CSS parser distinguish between condition-value pairs, especially when values themselves might contain commas, like in rgb() colors or font stacks.
Yes, you can nest if() functions within each other to create decision trees, though this can impact readability. Consider whether simpler alternatives might achieve the same result.