Do Web Developers Really Need to Know Rust?

Rust keeps appearing in developer surveys as the “most loved” language, but does that mean you should drop everything to learn it? For web developers comfortable with JavaScript or TypeScript, the answer isn’t straightforward—it depends entirely on what you’re building and what problems you’re trying to solve.

The Reality of Rust for Web Development in 2025

Rust vs JavaScript isn’t really an either-or decision. Most web developers won’t need Rust for everyday work. Building a typical SaaS app, e-commerce site, or content platform? JavaScript and TypeScript remain faster to ship and better supported by the ecosystem. The npm registry has millions of packages; Rust’s crates.io has tens of thousands. Your team already knows JavaScript. Deployment is straightforward.

But Rust excels in specific scenarios where JavaScript hits its limits:

• Performance-critical APIs handling thousands of requests per second
• WebAssembly modules for computationally intensive browser tasks
• Real-time systems where garbage collection pauses are unacceptable
• Security-sensitive services where memory safety prevents entire bug classes

Backend Rust: Where It Actually Makes Sense

For backend development, Axum and Actix have proven themselves in production. These aren’t experimental frameworks—companies like Discord and Cloudflare run Rust at scale.

Here’s a simple Axum API:

use axum::{Router, routing::get, Json};
use serde::Serialize;

#[derive(Serialize)]
struct Health {
    status: &'static str,
}

async fn health() -> Json<Health> {
    Json(Health { status: "OK" })
}

#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
    let app = Router::new()
        .route("/health", get(health));
    
    let listener = tokio::net::TcpListener::bind("0.0.0.0:3000")
        .await
        .unwrap();
    
    axum::serve(listener, app).await.unwrap();
}

Compile times are real—expect 30-60 seconds for incremental builds versus Go’s near-instant feedback. But you get memory safety without garbage collection, preventing entire categories of production bugs. For high-throughput APIs where every millisecond matters, this trade-off often makes sense.

Frontend Rust: Proceed with Caution

Frontend and backend Rust tell different stories. Frameworks like Leptos and Yew let you write entire web apps in Rust, compiling to WebAssembly. The developer experience has improved dramatically, but challenges remain:

• WASM bundles start at 100-200KB (larger than typical JavaScript bundles but smaller than previously stated)
• Hot reload is slower than Vite or Next.js
• No React ecosystem—you’re building from scratch
• JavaScript interop adds complexity

Where frontend Rust shines: performance-critical components like image editors, 3D visualizations, or cryptographic operations. Figma rewrote their multiplayer editing engine in Rust/WASM and cut load times by 3x. But they kept the UI in TypeScript.

The Honest Learning Curve

Learning Rust means accepting a steeper climb than most languages. The borrow checker will frustrate you. Lifetime annotations will confuse you. What takes an hour in TypeScript might take a day in Rust—at first.

Realistic timeline for web developers:

• Month 1-2: Fighting the compiler, questioning life choices
• Month 3-4: Patterns click, productivity improves
• Month 6+: Confident building production systems

The ownership model forces you to think differently about data flow. This makes you a better programmer, even if you return to JavaScript. But it’s a significant time investment.

When to Actually Consider Rust

Choose Rust when:

• Performance benchmarks show JavaScript can’t meet requirements
• You’re building WebAssembly modules for compute-heavy tasks
• Memory safety could prevent costly security incidents
• Your team has 6+ months to ramp up

Stick with JavaScript/TypeScript when:

• Shipping quickly matters more than peak performance
• You need extensive third-party integrations
• Your team is small or has high turnover
• The project is UI-heavy with frequent iterations

The Practical Path Forward

You don’t need to go all-in on Rust. Start small:

1. Build a performance-critical microservice in Rust
2. Replace one computationally expensive Node.js endpoint
3. Write a WebAssembly module for a specific browser bottleneck
4. Use Rust for CLI tools your team needs

This incremental approach lets you evaluate Rust’s benefits without betting the company. Tools like wasm-bindgen and napi-rs make it easier to integrate Rust into existing JavaScript projects.

Conclusion

Most web developers don’t need to know Rust in 2025. JavaScript and TypeScript remain the practical choice for the majority of web applications. But understanding when and why to reach for Rust—and having basic familiarity with its concepts—makes you a more versatile developer.

Rust isn’t replacing JavaScript. It’s filling gaps where JavaScript struggles: systems programming, performance-critical paths, and WebAssembly. Learn it if you’re curious, if you hit performance walls, or if you want to expand beyond traditional web development. Skip it if you’re happy with your current stack and it solves your problems.

The best developers know multiple tools and when to use each one. Rust is a powerful addition to that toolkit—just not a mandatory one.

FAQs

Complete picture for complete understanding

Capture every clue your frontend is leaving so you can instantly get to the root cause of any issue with OpenReplay — the open-source session replay tool for developers. Self-host it in minutes, and have complete control over your customer data.

Check our GitHub repo and join the thousands of developers in our community.